For example, suppose that the original statement is

If an animal is an elephant, then that animal is a mammal.

Then its contrapositive, obtained by interchanging the "if" and "then" clauses" and simultaneously negating them, is

If an animal is not a mammal, then that animal is not an elephant.

The two statements are exactly equivalent in meaning, as can be determined by the diagram at right. The original statement asserts, in effect, that the oval representing "elephants" is a subset of the "mammals" oval. The contrapositive asserts something that is geometrically equivalent—namely, that the shaded exterior of the "mammals" oval is a subset of the exterior of the "elephants" oval. In a similar way, it is easily seen that the converse of the original statement (formed by interchanging the "if" and "then" clauses) is logically equivalent to the original statement's inverse (formed by negating both clauses).      Next page


Previous pagePrevious Open Review window